After a long inward debate with myself, I decided that it is better if I respond to both “The Lamb” and “the Tyger” poems by William Blake simultaneously, so I can fully express my thoughts about them. Even if these two were made years apart, I know that they are connect , these two poems are a classic case of opposites, first off the names seem alike — using the animal’s name as the title, but notice how Blake spells “tyger” almost as if he is afraid to say is properly as to incur the tigers wrath. Both poems are set up alike as well, with the lamb he complements how soft its coat is and how tender its voice can be, as if making the creature so fragile that it can break on the slightest show of strength; with the tyger however, he compares it the fire itself — wild, uncontrollable, dangerous, and able to consume everything in sight. And most importantly, Blake, with both the lamb and the tyger, asks them both the question of who made them, as to inquire about the thought process of the cosmic being and how this being can produce such extreme opposites so completely. but in the end though, it is obvious that Blake is questioning not the meekness of the lamb or the voracity of the tyger, instead he is conflicted about the nature of us, for if the universe can make such pinnacles of weakness and strength, kindness and malevolence, light and darkness such as these, than what is man’s place in the spectrum of good and evil, are we lambs to the slaughter or tygers on the prowl
P.S.: I am aware that the poem “The Tyger” may not had been part of the homework, but after ready them both I knew that doing either of them separately would weaken the powerful focus of the whole
Read Full Post »